Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:41:48 -0500
From:      Kevin Kinsey <kdk@daleco.biz>
To:        keith@kgparts.com
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Erroneous delivery of list e-mail
Message-ID:  <461D0FCC.4020900@daleco.biz>
In-Reply-To: <1043.70.106.82.159.1176305385.squirrel@70.106.82.159>
References:  <200704111307.l3BD7RKp069142@pro26.abac.com>	<86r6qrujwa.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070411181800.0eb9afc1.breath@unix.net>	<867isjug0f.fsf@dwp.des.no>	<1279.70.106.82.159.1176304608.squirrel@70.106.82.159> <1043.70.106.82.159.1176305385.squirrel@70.106.82.159>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
keith@kgparts.com wrote:
> Now my sister-in-law just called me saying she is on the same email list
> and just got this last reply I sent out.... She also had over 100 and
> something emails from this list since yesterday. (Same time I must have
> been subscribed.)
>

That's probably the best clue so far; it wouldn't be hard for some
err, jokester, to falsify a mail or use the mailman interface to 
subscribe a list address somewhere else to a list here, would it?
He could simply be a list subscriber and sign up via the web interface
and then reply to the confirmation mail that was sent to his list?
I guess I need to go back and look at the Mailman interface.  Barring
that, some monkey business with mail(1) and the right command switches
could produce a similar effect.

Keith might allow us to know what list he and he relative are on,
as well --- if this (above) is the case, it might be possible to,
at the very least, get <<them, that is, the list>> unsubscribed.

Kevin Kinsey
-- 
There's a fine line between courage and foolishness.  Too bad it's not
a fence.

> I also just tried the unsubscribe email as directed with "unsubscribe" in
> the subject line... It did not work. Came back saying I am not on this
> list as a user.
> 
>> No I do not have any other accounts fwding to this address set up. They
>> have both been deleted to try to narrow this down....
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>> Yuri Grebenkin <breath@unix.net> writes:
>>>> "keith" <keith@kgparts.com> wrote:
>>>>> This is the header in the email of a message from the list. (same one
>>>>> I
>>>>> am
>>>>> fwding you):
>>>>>
>>>>> Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
>>>>> Received: from smtp-gw4.mailanyone.net (smtp-gwalt4.mailanyone.net
>>>>> [69.31.1.237])
>>>>> 	by pro26.abac.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3BDoGAI094609
>>>>> 	for <keith@kgparts.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>> 	(envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org)
>>>>> X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>>>> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>>>> [...]
>>> the headers are incomplete (probably through no fault of Keith's), but
>>> they show that the email transited through mailanyone.net which is
>>> *not* where it would go if Keith was actually subscribed - they would
>>> go directly from mx2.freebsd.org to kgparts.com or mx2.abac.com.
>>>
>>> Keith, do you happen to have a MailAnyone account which is forwarded
>>> to <keith@kgparts.com>?
>>>
>>> DES



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?461D0FCC.4020900>