Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 09:47:14 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Shawn <drevil@warpcore.org> Subject: Re: Memory Mangement Problem in 5.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <20030726164714.GA67851@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <3F221E08.FAE1638C@mindspring.com> References: <000001c3521a$7fa912c0$6bd4bfac@AlHindawi> <1059139238.50681.0.camel@CPE-65-26-140-154.kc.rr.com> <3F221E08.FAE1638C@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 11:22:00PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Shawn wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 02:21, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > You probably can't get away with the old gcc, since the binary > > > format changed For No Good Reason(tm). > > > > Didn't the GNU people say they had to change it to be more ABI compliant > > with the 'standard'? > > I will believe that when they upgrade their FORTRAN compiler > to be more compliant with 'the standard'. > The gcc-g95 developers have begun the merge of the Fortran 95 front end and runtime library into the tree-ssa branch of GCC. The target is to have a Fortran compiler that complies with ISO/IEC 1539-1:1997 include in gcc-3.5.0. BTW, the official name of the language is Fortran not FORTRAN. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030726164714.GA67851>