Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:27:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Will Henny" <willhenny@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GPL vs BSD Licence Message-ID: <cltggd$lei$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <41815B2B.7070801@gmx.de> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNEEJAEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-10-29, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com> wrote: > > It is. It is the stated policy of the FSF that loadable kernel modules > are considered part of the GPL work and therefore must be GPL'ed > themselves. That is where all this is coming from. Unless you're talking about the Hurd, the FSF has no say in the matter. The issue is discussed here: http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1735
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cltggd$lei$1>