Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 13:38:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com> To: Adam David <adam@veda.is> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apache_1.2.0+ssl_1.8.tar.gz is out Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970730133540.19785K-100000@alive.znep.com> In-Reply-To: <199707301828.SAA08049@ubiq.veda.is>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Adam David wrote: > >I found out, that there are new apache SSLeay patches out. > > >FTP Directory: ftp://ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/SSL/ > > > README . . . . . . . . . . . . . [May 29 15:58] 6k > > README.066 . . . . . . . . . . . [May 29 15:59] 2k > > README.080 . . . . . . . . . . . [Jul 1 12:44] 5k > > SSLeay-0.6.6.patch1. . . . . . . [May 29 17:15] 1k > > SSLeay-0.6.6.tar.gz. . . . . . . [May 29 17:15] 814k > > SSLeay-0.8.0.README. . . . . . . [Jul 1 12:44] 1k > > SSLeay-0.8.0.tar.gz. . . . . . . [Jul 3 15:12] 968k > > apache_1.1.1+1.3.ssl.tar.gz. . . [Jul 16 1996] 21k > > apache_1.2.0+ssl_1.8.tar.gz. . . [Jul 7 09:56] 24k > > apache_1.2b10+ssl_1.6.tar.gz . . [May 3 21:41] 22k > > >Do you plan to upgrade the apache port with that changes > >so that a secure server would be made possible ? > > And does this mean SSLeay-0.8 is needed as a separate port from -0.6.6 ? > (i.e. does anything worthwhile depend on the previous version, either within > the ports tree or outside of it?) You can use 1.2.0+ssl_1.8 with SSLeay-0.6.6 if you really want, but it is probably better to go for 0.8.1. There may well be problems upgrading it; short term it may be better to add a seperate port for 0.8.1. Note that 1.2.0+ssl_1.8 doesn't apply cleanly against 1.2.1 (or 1.2.2 when it comes out), but it is pretty easy to patch in the other parts by hand.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970730133540.19785K-100000>