Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 01:30:36 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Subject: Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE Message-ID: <20040618012806.H72823@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20040618062418.GU61448@elvis.mu.org> References: <20040618094356.O22477@is.park.rambler.ru> <20040618062418.GU61448@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I was going to suggest vmstat now that sfbufs are used for so many > other things than just "sendfile bufs". > > -- > - Alfred Perlstein How about if we do this: 5.x: List sfbufs both in vmstat _and_ in netstat -m, as their status is relevant to both network and general memory usage. 4.x: MFC the vmstat implementation. This would preserve 4.x's behavior, but allow 5.x users (who have a new netstat -m output format anyway) to see sfbuf information without invocing multiple utilities. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040618012806.H72823>