Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:04:32 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! KSE needs more attention Message-ID: <20040606220432.GA97091@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406061717480.7928-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20040606211249.GC96607@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406061717480.7928-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 05:27:56PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > As for alpha, we don't even seem to be able to degrade it to tier 2 > > without losing face. kris@ has already stopped package builds for it > > for his own sake. > > We shouldn't keep an arch at tier 1 just to save face. Better to just > lower it to tier 2 and be done with it. My $.02, FWIW. You misunderstand my statement. Lowering alpha to tier 2 is what I suggested multiple times before. The point is that we haven't yet and alpha is degenerating more and more while we fail to adjust the tierness. That's where we fail to save face. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040606220432.GA97091>