Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 14:22:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org Cc: dpk@notreal.com, garbanzo@hooked.net, rabtter@aye.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I want to break binary compatibility. Message-ID: <199808251922.OAA00955@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980824171015.25644D-100000@fledge.watson.org> (message from Robert Watson on Mon, 24 Aug 1998 17:11:55 -0400 (EDT)) References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980824171015.25644D-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> My favored choice would be to modify the standard dynamic link support to > check /etc/ld.conf (or a sysctl) to determine whether the system policy > currently allowed dynamic linking or not, and if so, whether user-defined > paths were allowed. This, in combination with the bless-support would > work pretty well. Would /etc/ld.conf be vulnerable to chroots? Best, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808251922.OAA00955>