Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:18:23 -0500 (EST) From: John Dyson <dyson@dyson.iquest.net> To: ache@nagual.ru (=?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?=) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, current@freebsd.org, dyson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent vfork kernel changes broke csh & tcsh! Message-ID: <199704221818.NAA02417@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970422212025.363D-100000@nagual.ru> from "[______ ______]" at "Apr 22, 97 09:27:08 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Can we left vfork at traditional BSD stage and not make it > as powerful as rfork is? It seems some programs expect traditional > semantics... > The problem is that the new vfork re-implemented the traditional BSD method... Too much code appears to be broken. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704221818.NAA02417>