Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:21:15 +0100 From: Frank de Bot <lists@searchy.net> To: Michael Grimm <trashcan@ellael.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?! Message-ID: <56F2600B.70208@searchy.net> In-Reply-To: <6493A52A-7856-4689-A8CC-5B03F65AEB17@ellael.org> References: <2E32FD64-2BF6-46CE-BAD2-39AF82E29E33@ellael.org> <56E1BA30.7090306@utanet.at> <6493A52A-7856-4689-A8CC-5B03F65AEB17@ellael.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I agree it's easy, but I think ports should not have such dependency.
The ports system lets you choose the SSL package (or base) you want to
build everything with. I think it's going to be problematic if a port
decides on it's own to install openssl/libressl whilst you have build
everything with a the other SSL package.
Michael Grimm wrote:
> Walter Schwarzenfeld <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at> wrote:
>
>> Makefile
>> OPTIONS_DEFAULT= RESSL
>>
>> RESSL_LIB_DEPENDS= libtls.so:${PORTSDIR}/security/libressl
>>
>>
>> turn option RESSL to off.
>
> Ok, thanks, and that was easy ;-) Sorry, I should have found that myself.
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56F2600B.70208>