Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:31:32 -0400 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why 7.0 is so late ? Message-ID: <18199.57028.210903.451591@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <20071018190507.GB57252@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20071017133352.GE67677@pcjas.obspm.fr> <47161B5D.9050002@pacific.net.sg> <20071017165423.G89276@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <13413b8f0710170920t5e5a03f9tcd703e6239db0296@mail.gmail.com> <20071017192628.GA1238@kobe.laptop> <20071018180902.GB28392@demeter.hydra> <20071018190507.GB57252@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jerry McAllister writes: > > I'd much rather that a RELEASE version is as stable as it > > can reasonably be made than that it arrives "on time". > > Yup. I think that is the way all of us feel. I don't think many will argue, at least not loudly. However ... many also have bad memories of 5.0, and the grim\\\\ firm desire to never let that happen again. The Release Engineering squad (et al.) has made changes that seem to be working; let's keep an eye on things, but not cry "Wolf!" until we start losing sheep. Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18199.57028.210903.451591>