Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:32:06 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groff alternative? Message-ID: <86k6mo0xmh.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200504262010.49509@harrymail> References: <200504262010.49509@harrymail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> writes: > I'm using NO_CXX in my make.conf to strip down the base system to > ~50MB including man pages. The only problem is that groff is missing > if I don't build c++, and even if I build groff itself and the > needed libstdc++ it costs me about 10MB. If I just skip NO_CXX it's > only 500k more, so I moved my patches to /dev/null. Install pre-rendered man pages instead of the mdoc source, and fake up a shell script that locates the appropriate page, decompresses it and pipes it to $PAGER. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k6mo0xmh.fsf>