Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 18:01:39 GMT From: Twoje Radio <radiomlodychbandytow@o2.pl> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/164803: Unclear manual page for mount_unionfs(8) Message-ID: <201202051801.q15I1d3Q062249@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201202051810.q15IA6oR014745@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 164803 >Category: misc >Synopsis: Unclear manual page for mount_unionfs(8) >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sun Feb 05 18:10:06 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Twoje Radio >Release: >Organization: >Environment: >Description: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=mount_unionfs&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE&arch=default&format=html "The traditional mode uses the same way as the old unionfs for backward compatibility" This text appears before any other mention about the way unionfs works. I think that majority of people reading this would like to know *what* does the option do first and historic reason later, if at all. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201202051801.q15I1d3Q062249>