Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 16:39:33 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: size of kernel after gcc4.2 upgrade Message-ID: <f39grg$3sg$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <200705261623.54752.shoesoft@gmx.net> References: <20070525095146.GA45288@freebsd.org> <200705261554.38444.shoesoft@gmx.net> <20070526140421.GA97649@freebsd.org> <200705261623.54752.shoesoft@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Stefan Ehmann wrote: > Yes, but Ivan said he used default flags. So I think in his case the symbol > files are mainly responsible for the 106MB vs 26MB. Yes, symbol files are 76 MB, leaving 31 MB for the kernel+modules. That's not so bad. Can anyone comment about will the symbols be useful in production kernels, for better backtraces? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGWEauldnAQVacBcgRAszHAKDejp8c6vakKu56gFagcsR0REE8WACfW1Li 50RuhVlE7We/PRTCCAAHPe8= =zm2u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f39grg$3sg$1>