Date: 18 Oct 2001 14:32:10 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, Drew Tomlinson <drew@mykitchentable.net>, Mark.Andrews@isc.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dynamic IPFW Rules Message-ID: <xzpwv1tdt85.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20011018125003.B29670@tao.org.uk> References: <200110172350.f9HNor915316@drugs.dv.isc.org> <000d01c15777$1b9a8240$0301a8c0@bigdaddy> <20011018013856.C373@blossom.cjclark.org> <xzpitddffz9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20011018031427.B3298@blossom.cjclark.org> <xzpelo1fbgx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20011018125003.B29670@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> writes: > I'd be interested in taking a look at doing this if no other > committers have time. I rely quite heavilily on ipfw on -stable, > and have already hacked in the change that supressed the timed out > dynamic rules from the 'ipfw show' output. Great! > Or is someone else working on this already? I don't want to tread on > anyone's toes. I was going to, but decided I'd rather not. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpwv1tdt85.fsf>