Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:25:33 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sgml entities for CPU architectures? Message-ID: <46F541FD.8040807@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1217454532.20070922005116@rulez.sk> References: <47d0403c0709211213n50988b33u2b9bdd15475bfcdd@mail.gmail.com> <1217454532.20070922005116@rulez.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] If memory serves me right, Daniel Gerzo wrote: >> I'm updating my patch to the FAQ (docs/115000) for danger@'s >> (somewhat) new daily snapshot >> builds, which are specific to x86 and amd64. Should I just use literals for >> these architectures, or are the entity-ified somewhere that I haven't found yet? > > As far as I know, we do not have entities for architectures. The release documents grew these entities fairly recently...see src/release/doc/share/sgml/release.ent (on HEAD only at the moment). Bruce. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG9UIB2MoxcVugUsMRAunTAKD5sLvwEYOh+kJTMgfXPMiTlDp5JgCgq7Di BrlGKKuasDuJXZgWt8fNU78= =hvz9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46F541FD.8040807>