Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 21:13:15 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> Cc: luigi@iet.unipi.it Subject: Re: Device polling Message-ID: <20040613181315.GB54104@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <40CC97E0.5010003@alumni.rice.edu> References: <Pine.BSF.4.58L0.0406110957020.49590@crimp.gluerecord.net> <40CC97E0.5010003@alumni.rice.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 01:07:28PM -0500, Jon Noack wrote: [...] > I just tested this on my SMP all-in-one home server (Web, Mail, NFS, > Samba, Squid, etc.). It's been up for over 24 hours with no apparent > issues. The machine is used pretty heavily, with NFS mounted home > directories and CVS mirror (see below) -- a CVS update of the src tree > over NFS has done a good job of breaking fragile setups in the past. > Everything seemed OK. That said, peak performance (as tested by iperf) > took a nosedive: with 32-bit em adapters (gige), tcp bandwidth dropped > from over 360Mbps to around 200 Mbps. If anyone has any suggestions for > more in-depth testing, I'd be willing to try them. If I have the time I > may also try the latest netperf patch and see how that affects things. > What are your operational polling(4) parameters? What the HZ is set to? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAzJk7qRfpzJluFF4RAnR+AJ9sQ7tMb1EOpv5Gg5M/Xp+DeLlRfQCcD1GB 8dT8ZDdvsp+MEE4OHddjJhk= =16Xf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040613181315.GB54104>