Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:43:52 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP Message-ID: <20050418154352.GB756@empiric.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20050418094356.O1882@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org> <86ll7i30mc.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050416211000.GF784@empiric.icir.org> <20050418094356.O1882@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:46:39AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > Which? I've begun designing ng_pppoa. I haven't written a Netgraph node before, so that should be interesting. > NATM is NOT part of HARP. We can safely remove HARP without touching NATM. > But someone needs to sit down and fix NATM to be MPSAFE. rwatson has been volunteering to do this, I've offered to test with real hardware. I am about to move continents again so my level of disruption is likely to be high. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050418154352.GB756>