Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:25:26 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Splitting up options and files by subsystem Message-ID: <XFMail.20020715142526.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Back when I first started working on splitting up NOTES into MI and
MD sections, I brought up this idea and was met with mostly apathy.
The idea is to allow a subsystem (such as ACPI or a device driver used
on several platforms but not all, like atkbdc(4) and friends) to
specify its NOTES, files, and options contents into subsystem-specific
files that the architecture-specific files could then include.
For example, we could have a NOTES.acpi, options.acpi, and files.acpi
that were included by sys/{i386,ia64}/NOTES, options.{i386,ia64}, and
files.{i386,ia64}. Another example would be a NOTES.atkbdc,
files.atkbdc, and options.atkbdc for the atkbd(4), atkbdc(4), and psm(4)
drivers and related options.
IMO, this scales better than duplicating content across a bunch of
different files. Trying to get an Alpha LINT to successfully
config(8) is pointing out lots of places where our current model hasn't
scaled.
--
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020715142526.jhb>