Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Dec 2024 20:54:20 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        virtualization@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 283103] Yet another Parallels arm64 panic
Message-ID:  <bug-283103-27103-Vjbnv1apN5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-283103-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-283103-27103@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D283103

--- Comment #8 from Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> ---
I don't see any particular reason an ithread must not sleep, so long as it =
is
not shared with any other interrupt.  I think INTR_EXCL provides the desired
semantics there?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-283103-27103-Vjbnv1apN5>