Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:47:56 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/emacs-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/editors/emacs-devel/files patch-Makefile.in patch-configure patch-src-image.c Message-ID: <86zkvv4xk3.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <861v97zzvt.fsf@chateau.d.if> (Ashish SHUKLA's message of "Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:11:58 %2B0530") References: <201007281223.o6SCN2wZ043075@repoman.freebsd.org> <86sk33w8ck.fsf@gmail.com> <8739v24yop.fsf@monte-cristo.france> <86sk1omm0h.fsf@gmail.com> <861v97zzvt.fsf@chateau.d.if>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes: > Anonymous writes: >> FYI, pointyhat doesn't have that etc/DOC-24.0.50.2 file on 9-CURRENT. >> And there are no packages for 9-CURRENT, neither for amd64 nor for i386. > > I'm surprised. I tried an update of emacs-devel with tinderbox and it resulted > in same file being generated[1]. I guess I'll have to observe the build > process more carefully before pushing the new update. Can't you just make a note to ignore the bug if pointyhat doesn't complain? I think binary packages are more important than corner cases. Besides, have you found anyone else who have same issue on 9-CURRENT?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zkvv4xk3.fsf>