Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 23:49:25 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_thread.c Message-ID: <4160F275.6010703@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20041004062359.GH1034@green.homeunix.org> References: <200410032006.i93K6B4T001218@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041003204604.GA683@nagual.pp.ru> <4160701A.2050504@elischer.org> <20041004062359.GH1034@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 02:33:14PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>Andrey Chernov wrote: >> >>>On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 08:06:11PM +0000, Julian Elischer wrote: >>> >>> >>>> sys/kern kern_thread.c >>>>Log: >>>>Always strt out with an initilalised ksegrp structure. >>> >>> >>>Is it supposed to fix slow coming afterboot hang I see in -current already >>>about 2 months (last working kernel is from Aug 8)? My machine is UP with >>>4BSD sched running nothing more complex than mysqld. >>> >> >>probably not, but there some changes coming that may make a difference > > > Isn't this the one where I asked, "How is this uninitialized?" in any > of the existing code? you mean "How is this initialiased?" I don't remember the question, but it's not a simple as it seems.. it is partly initilised during use.. teh trick is that the scheduler private extension isn't. (it may however be nulls by default from UMA but I don't know that).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4160F275.6010703>