Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:00:59 +0900 From: Masanori OZAWA <ozawa@ongs.co.jp> To: Matteo Riondato <matteo@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, daichi@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010 Message-ID: <43C393EB.4020304@ongs.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20060110081651.GD42716@kaiser.sig11.org> References: <E1EuQjU-000JgQ-DK@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <43BD1054.7020409@ongs.co.jp> <43C2472C.5070103@freebsd.org> <20060110081651.GD42716@kaiser.sig11.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matteo Riondato wrote:
> I think that on sys/fs/unionfs/union_vfsops.c, line 116, done should
> be size_t, to have unionfs compiled on amd64 (and probably other
> !32bit archs)
>
> Best Regards
Yes, you are correct. Danny have pointed out the same problem.
It is a careless mistake, so sorry. Please try the latest patch
as follow:
For 7-current patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p4.diff
For 6.x patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p4.diff
--
ONGS Inc.
Masanori OZAWA (ozawa@ongs.co.jp)
WWW: http://www.ongs.co.jp/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43C393EB.4020304>