Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:32:45 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 initcpu.c mp_machdep.c src/sys Message-ID: <XFMail.20030122133245.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200301221818.h0MIIjNf074904@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22-Jan-2003 John Baldwin wrote: > jhb 2003/01/22 10:18:45 PST > > Modified files: > sys/i386/i386 initcpu.c mp_machdep.c > sys/i386/include md_var.h > Log: > - Move enable_sse()'s prototype to machine/md_var.h. > - Sort definition of cpu_* variables appropriately. > - Move cpu_fxsr out of the magic non-BSS set of variables and stick it in > the BSS along with hw_instruction_sse (make the latter static as well). > > Submitted by: bde (partially) Can someone please explain why we have hw_instruction_sse and cpu_fxsr that always have the same value? Is there a reason we can't just axe hw_instruction_sse and have the hw.instruction.sse sysctl read cpu_fxsr instead? -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030122133245.jhb>