Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 May 2000 12:58:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Igor Roshchin <str@giganda.komkon.org>
To:        "Robert Watson" <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Applying patches with out a compiler
Message-ID:  <200005121658.MAA86229@giganda.komkon.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000512123717.44824A-100000@fledge.watson.org> from "Robert Watson" at "May 12, 2000 12:40:04 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> 
> For patches where it's appropriate, I've been strongly considering
> releasing "packages" that update the key parts of the base OS for security
> fixes.  This would be similar to the BSD/OS patch level support for fixes,
> although restricted only to security stuff.  This would provide access to
> security fixes for non-source-centric sites, which I think is important. 
> With 4.0 I haven't had the opportunity to exercise this possibility as
> yet. :-)
> 
> I.e., 
> 
>   pkg_add secpatch_4.0-RELEASE_001.tgz
> 
> Would replace the faulty binaries with better ones, and leave behind a
> package install record so you could easily determine which security
> patches are installed.  And if appropriate, could back up the original
> binaries allowing pkg_delete to restore the original state.
> 
> Any thoughts on this?
> 
>   Robert N M Watson 
> 

That would be very useful for the production environment,
as well as for the low-end computers, or just computers with limited
resources.

Igor



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005121658.MAA86229>