Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:15:14 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: request: merging if_ath_tx branch to HEAD Message-ID: <4EAF6442.5020901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon7CiVJs1S9jrWx9%2B6PjhxVcQyp2kQdkQ49Gcvtzq3-PA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmokj=BJjSrdvM8DxD4PJScakP4N_Kjt_AbF%2B8=hM_CWX5A@mail.gmail.com> <4EAF18B2.9040909@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-Vmon7CiVJs1S9jrWx9%2B6PjhxVcQyp2kQdkQ49Gcvtzq3-PA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/31/2011 17:22, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 31 October 2011 14:52, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd >>> rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate >>> situation of having to keep merging between the if_ath_tx branch and >>> -HEAD. >> >> Is this work that is planned to be migrated to 9.0-RELEASE? If not, >> shouldn't it wait till after the release? > > Well, it depends on how long 9.0-RELEASE is going to take. If it's > going to take days, then sure I can wait. But if it's going to take > weeks, I'll likely _have_ the rest of the if_ath_tx missing pieces > done and ready for merge into 9.0. > > In any case, I do want to merge the ath 11n stuff into -9, so even if > it's not done by 9.0, it'll be done shortly after. Given that RC1 is already out, you should probably check with re@ first. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EAF6442.5020901>