Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:54:16 +0200 From: Milan Obuch <freebsd-ports@dino.sk> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No update for a day on ports? Message-ID: <20210401095416.096f62c4@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <20210401074704.7s6lqsqu6mnn2qwo@aching.in.mat.cc> References: <20210401082247.668e4394@zeta.dino.sk> <YGVxnG3KLewnaLQ9@home.opsec.eu> <20210401091615.37e497fb@zeta.dino.sk> <20210401074704.7s6lqsqu6mnn2qwo@aching.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:47:04 +0200, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:16:15AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote: > > Also, what about svn mirror, as is done for src repository, for 11 > > and 12 branches at least? I did not tried it recently, but it used > > to work. For some boxes, adding git to the mix would be big PITA. > > There will be no Git to Subversion conversion for ports, like for > docs. The only reason there is for the base system on 11 and 12 is > because Subversion was the source control software used when they > were released. > This is unpleasant move for me. This means git or equivalent (and dependencies) must be installed on any box where tracking ports tree is planned/needed... and no tool like svnlite could be expected in base system for some time. So I need some work on my local infrastructure to adjust to this move. C'est la vie... Regards, Milan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210401095416.096f62c4>