Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:51:43 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>, Matt Jacob <mjacob@FreeBSD.org>, scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_all.c Message-ID: <20020923135143.B14701@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20020923134731.A14701@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>; from brooks@one-eyed-alien.net on Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:47:31PM -0700 References: <20020923132415.A24262@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209231333010.637-100000@beppo> <20020923134731.A14701@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:47:31PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:37:39PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> >
> > > If we're going to allow 0 we should probably also allow values between
> > > 0 and 100 as well and just toss the checks. I don't really object to
> > > letting the user take aim at their foot if that's what they want to do.
> >
> > You don't understand the real issue, which is that delaying after a bus
> > reset is an SPI-only issue, and one that is not encapsulated in any spec
> > in any hard and fast way- so don't talk bout 'aiming at foot' unless it
> > the thing you're aiming happens to be your nourishment mandibiles.
>
> I don't think I ever claimed I did understand it. I addressed an
> existing annoyance without changing the default behavior one bit. If
> there's not reason for the lower bounds checks then let's get rid of
> them entierly. If there is a reason for them, then we can
> leave them in (after making them consistant again). It just seems
> really odd to me that we would allow values in the range of
> {0, 100-INTMAX}.
I just noticed my error after Ken pointed it out more clearly.
Sorry for the trouble.
-- Brooks
--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9j37eXY6L6fI4GtQRAvxkAKDSiP2TnjAGQSmj70ldTXStMENtxQCeJKBf
XkMbh9zgNunIIB4i4LYISXc=
=Ac2M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020923135143.B14701>