Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:24:51 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyAyNzUwMTRdIGF1ZGlvL2xpbnV4LWM3LWFsc2EtcGx1Z2lu?= =?UTF-8?B?cy1vc3M6IGZhaWxzIHRvIGJ1aWxkIHdpdGggLWVuYWJsZS10cml2aWFsLWF1?= =?UTF-8?B?dG8tdmFyLWluaXQtemVyby1rbm93aW5nLWl0LXdpbGwtYmUtcmVtb3ZlZC1m?= =?UTF-8?B?cm9tLWNsYW5n?=
Message-ID:  <bug-275014-4077-MDT7ybodjP@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-275014-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-275014-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D275014

--- Comment #5 from Sean McBride <sean@rogue-research.com> ---
Tijl, thanks for your reply!

So it's simply that gcc doesn't know/accept the
-enable-trivial-auto-var-init-zero-knowing-it-will-be-removed-from-clang fl=
ag,
which makes sense.

Why does it compile with gcc?  I've not encountered a lot of C/C++ code the=
se
days that doesn't compile with both gcc and clang...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-275014-4077-MDT7ybodjP>