Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:24:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyAyNzUwMTRdIGF1ZGlvL2xpbnV4LWM3LWFsc2EtcGx1Z2lu?= =?UTF-8?B?cy1vc3M6IGZhaWxzIHRvIGJ1aWxkIHdpdGggLWVuYWJsZS10cml2aWFsLWF1?= =?UTF-8?B?dG8tdmFyLWluaXQtemVyby1rbm93aW5nLWl0LXdpbGwtYmUtcmVtb3ZlZC1m?= =?UTF-8?B?cm9tLWNsYW5n?= Message-ID: <bug-275014-4077-MDT7ybodjP@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-275014-4077@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275014 --- Comment #5 from Sean McBride <sean@rogue-research.com> --- Tijl, thanks for your reply! So it's simply that gcc doesn't know/accept the -enable-trivial-auto-var-init-zero-knowing-it-will-be-removed-from-clang flag, which makes sense. Why does it compile with gcc? I've not encountered a lot of C/C++ code these days that doesn't compile with both gcc and clang... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-275014-4077-MDT7ybodjP>