Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To:        "Michael E. Conlen" <meconlen@obfuscated.net>
Cc:        Christopher Weimann <cweimann@k12hq.com>
Subject:   RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.10307251925430.16986-100000@misery.sdf.com>
In-Reply-To: <FGEGKFPBILMAPHFOHIIFEECPDPAA.meconlen@obfuscated.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Michael E. Conlen wrote:

> I was concerned about the disk cache because of this link
> 
> http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html#shbuf
> 
> which says...

<inaccurate PostgreSQL info deleted>

> But now that I have looked a bit more I see that this link
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/aw_pgsql_book/hw_performance/node6.html
...

  I would go with the information from the PostgreSQL site.  It is at
least reviewed by the developers (if not written by them).


Tom


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10307251925430.16986-100000>