Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 21:19:41 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r292723 - in head: lib/libc share/mk Message-ID: <CABh_MKmMT6EuKMPOan=ibL_J3zbSPSVFk5eAbuEoNr_hjBNq8Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201512251129.tBPBTIZp058825@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201512251129.tBPBTIZp058825@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Colin, First of all: I Am Not A Linker Expert. 2015-12-25 12:29 GMT+01:00 Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>: > Make libxnet.so a symlink to libc.so. This makes `-lxnet` a no-op, as > POSIX requires for the c99 compiler. I seem to remember I had some issues in the past where I was linking against libc explicitly. Maybe it had something to do with linking both against -lpthread and -lc, but if you pass in -lc later on the command line, libc overrides the symbols that have to be provided by -lpthread? If that's (still) the case, would it make sense to just provide libxnet in the form of an empty .a file instead? -- Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl> Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands KvK-nr.: 62051717
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABh_MKmMT6EuKMPOan=ibL_J3zbSPSVFk5eAbuEoNr_hjBNq8Q>