Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:47:46 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r190944 - in head/contrib/libpcap: . bpf/net pcap Message-ID: <20090411214746.92c585da.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1281775D-CD42-4430-9ED0-8472F10826EA@gmail.com> References: <200904111736.n3BHaBP7093616@svn.freebsd.org> <1281775D-CD42-4430-9ED0-8472F10826EA@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:37:28 +0100 Rui Paulo <rpaulo@gmail.com> mentioned: > > On 11 Apr 2009, at 18:36, Rui Paulo wrote: > > > Author: rpaulo > > Date: Sat Apr 11 17:36:11 2009 > > New Revision: 190944 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/190944 > > > > Log: > > Revert previous commit that commented out some bpf functions. > > Unconstify arguments of bpf_image(), bpf_filter() and bpf_dump(). > > This > > is needed because some ports rely heavely on these arguments (some of > > them even roll out their own implemenentations of bpf_dump). > > We can revisit this issue in the future if ports start complying with > new libpcap headers. > Have you analyzed how much ports depend on this? We can fix them locally if the number is not that high. We have already done that with usb and other changes. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkng18IACgkQK/VZk+smlYHhwgCaAmP+CLt6ZrQZZG2Bb+1JhYsb 3O8Ani6vtivghQMfeQAutTyVjjobpFfL =iCge -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49e0d7bc967002332039797!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090411214746.92c585da.stas>