Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 4 Nov 2012 23:02:45 +0100
From:      Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To:        Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Do we have a CPUTYPE=native and/or generic stability problem?
Message-ID:  <20121104230245.00007139@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <CACdU%2Bf-CYTE3XffH3_Q9VbZubYe6LHVn0Gz9ULUmKDxVQ4uWyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20121103232433.00005eee@unknown> <CACdU%2Bf-CYTE3XffH3_Q9VbZubYe6LHVn0Gz9ULUmKDxVQ4uWyQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 03:43:13 -0600 Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Not sure if your hitting the same bug, that was found in PR 112997.
> 
> When you set CPUTYPE?=native, bsd.cpu.mk doesn't set MACHINE_CPU to
> the correct values for your CPUTYPE.
> 
> See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/112997 for a patch
> to bsd.cpu.mk.

I try to get a look at it this week.

> Does your system compile correctly, if you specify the CPUTYPE?

I haven't tried it yet. I will give it a try later.

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121104230245.00007139>