Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:15:23 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: freebsd-docs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PR docs/21708 Message-ID: <20031016041523.33fd236a.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20031016010525.GA14918@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20031016010525.GA14918@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:05:25 -0400 Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> wrote: > > What is the procedure for suggesting a PR that appears to be old and > forgotten be closed? > > PR docs/21708 complains that the wording for the "timeout" value > in kevent(2) is ambiguous. I don't know if someone fixed it on their > own but the current wording is: > If it seems to be fixed either close it or set it to feedback for a period of time. I think the PR doc has more information on this that I can comment on. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031016041523.33fd236a.trhodes>