Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:18:53 -0500
From:      Andrew Hall <halla3@corp.earthlink.net>
To:        gldisater@gto.net
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: JDK 1.5 and 5.3
Message-ID:  <41F6554D.4000809@corp.earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <41F64E8E.9050207@gto.net>
References:  <41F53D9A.5020408@corp.earthlink.net> <41F64E8E.9050207@gto.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremy,

Thank you very much for your reply. 

Drew

Jeremy Faulkner wrote:

> Andrew Hall wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I have a few questions about jdk and 5.3.
>>
>> 1. If one does a src compile, it requires that the linux-sun-jdk to 
>> be installed to bootstrap the compile of native jdk.
>>
>> Why would freebsd not use a binary version of it's own native jdk to 
>> bootstrap itself?  If that's not feasible, then why would the jdk 
>> port not immediately remove all the linux crap that it installs if 
>> its not needed?  If something is only temporary, then it should be 
>> removed immediately after use right :)?
>
>
> Sun's licensing terms do not allow the distribution of a binary jdk. 
> The FreeBSD Foundation pushed long and hard to get a license to 
> distribute the diablo-jdk13. I don't know why there hasn't been a 
> diablo-jdk14 released, but I can only assume it involves Sun.
>
>> 2. Where did the browser plugin go?  In 1.3 and 1.4 I symlinked 
>> /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so to what ever jdk 
>> I was using.  For example:
>>
>> /usr/X11R6/lib/browser_plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so -> 
>> /usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji.so
>>
>> But in 1.5 I don't see this .so, nor does the plugin directory even 
>> exist.  Is there a new way I am not aware of?
>
>
> The jdk1.5 port is very young, the patchset-1 was only announced on 
> the 19th:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2005-January/003376.html
>
> Plugin support was not included with this patchset. Please be patient, 
> the jdk is big and the team porting it is very small.
>
>> 3. Since the linux jdk is not necessary, is there an easy way to get 
>> a list of everything that was installed as the req for the native jdk 
>> compile so I may remove it all (and its deps)?
>
>
> pkg_delete knows what to remove and will do as it's told if you pass 
> the -f argument. Read the available documentation before proceeding.
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41F6554D.4000809>