Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:39:38 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Running the network stack without Giant -- change in default coming Message-ID: <7meklw6lnp.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040824102109.89999C-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040824102109.89999C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:41:20 +0000 (UTC),
Robert Watson wrote:
> - We've focussed primarily on getting mainstream network configurations to
> run without Giant: this means that less mainstream subsystems (parts of
> IPv6, some netgraph nodes, IPX, etc) are currently unsafe without the
> Giant lock turned on.
I'm interesting to use without Giant. But (as you know :-)) I'm using
IPv6 usually. How can I help to test this?
I'm sorry I don't understand how it is difficult, but is it possible
to protect whole IPv6 code only with Giant without network stack
Giant?
--
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7meklw6lnp.wl>