Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:13:31 -0500 From: Bill Vermillion <bill@bilver.wjv.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 cisco's and a fbsd box running bgp Message-ID: <20010104011331.A62078@wjv.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010103204422.stox@imagescape.com>; from stox@imagescape.com on Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:44:22PM -0600 References: <20010103202022.A60418@wjv.com> <XFMail.010103204422.stox@imagescape.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:44:22PM -0600, Kenneth P. Stox thus spoke: > > On 04-Jan-01 Bill Vermillion wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 09:58:44AM +1100, Kal Torak thus spoke: > >> > I had seen the Adaptec board a few places, but it's expensive and I am > >> > sick of Adaptec lately. > > > >> I agree with you, but I would also have to say the Adaptec Quad > >> ethernet card is probably the best on the market atm... Its > >> 64-bit, the others I have seen are all 32... > > > > Then you have to have a motherboard which supports 64 bit. More > > added expense. > I think the PCI-64 spec requires that the board also function in > a PCI-32 slot. The driver may not support it, but the hardware > should. I saw some 64 PCI's and they surely wouildn't fit in the PC-32 slot - too many pins. Or did I see something different. Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010104011331.A62078>