Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 10:27:09 -0400 From: Matteo Riondato <matteo@FreeBSD.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r364435 - head/usr.sbin/kldxref Message-ID: <91E4947E-61FF-4C17-B380-A4918814D8BB@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <202008201850.07KIokXB063333@repo.freebsd.org> References: <202008201850.07KIokXB063333@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Aug 20, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > Author: dim > Date: Thu Aug 20 18:50:46 2020 > New Revision: 364435 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364435 >=20 > Log: > Bump kldxref's MAXSEGS to 16, to stop complaints about the kernel > supposedly having too many segments, when lld 11 links it. Such = kernels > should load just fine. Hi, I was doing an upgrade from 12.2-R to HEAD today, and at the end of = installkernel I got the warning =E2=80=9Ckldxref: too many segments=E2=80= =9D. Still, the system seems to claim that installkernel succeded. I = believe the message is caused by the fact that the system kldxref is = used to kldxref the new kernel, rather than using the one from = buildworld (I got this idea by looking at KLDXREF_CMD in = sys/conf/kern.opts.mk).=20 I don=E2=80=99t know if the message is innocuous or not (although I=E2=80=99= d love to know), but I also wonder whether installkernel should pick the = buildworld kldxref rather than the installed one. Thanks, Matteo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91E4947E-61FF-4C17-B380-A4918814D8BB>