Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:37:00 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r383538 - head/databases/sqlitemanager Message-ID: <55244DFC.4050609@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <55244A00.6010702@marino.st> References: <201504072014.t37KEtvQ028188@svn.freebsd.org> <55243D74.7060009@marino.st> <55244200.9060002@FreeBSD.org> <55244A00.6010702@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07.04.2015 17:20, John Marino wrote:
> Okay, so you "save" the port that was going to be deleted, but since you
> did it against standards, you then suggest that I clean up after you
> because I pointed out the mistake? (the same that that was just pointed
> out in heavy fashion last week).
Yes, I do think it is better to save a port imperfectly, than to let it expire
for a silly reason. The port is now better, than it was. If it can be improved
further, you are welcome to it.
> (there it was said *NEVER* use CP to install files, so obviously what
> you did is not fine.)
I don't know, John, what your expectations are of the fellow ports-maintainers,
but I'm not going to review archives of mailing lists every time I do a commit.
If portlint and other automated checks I'm aware of are happy, then so am I.
Thank you for your time.
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55244DFC.4050609>