Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:40:11 -0400 From: Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com> To: Atom Powers <atom.powers@gmail.com> Cc: Marc =?ISO-8859-1?B?Ry4=?= Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@toybox.placo.com>, Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>, chad@shire.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? Message-ID: <cone.1151484011.696455.14057.5001@35st-server.simplicato.com> References: <20060620060845.U1114@ganymede.hub.org> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOECCFEAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <ef10de9a0606211118v43e0c3f4g1631c6c617bb6970@mail.gmail.com> <20060621183832.H1114@ganymede.hub.org> <ef10de9a0606211523h566b86c7u636889d826ce38e5@mail.gmail.com> <20060621195523.I1114@ganymede.hub.org> <df9ac37c0606220834h3d122cc9n4804674d5ce7009b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Atom Powers writes: > Yes. All the servers I'm installing this year will have SATA drives > (and 3ware RAID controllers). The Western Digital Raptor drives are > every bit as good as the SCSI drives I used to get. Perhaps as the ones you used to get, but not as good as you can get. Dont get me wrong.. I can get approval to go SCSI since our machines need at least 1T+ (the storage machines), but looking at the benchmarks at storagereview (http://storagereview.com) shows there is still a significant performance difference between SCSI and SATA.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cone.1151484011.696455.14057.5001>