Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:36:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACE Proactor and libkse Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10307152132320.10905-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030715231600.GA676@crodrigues.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 02:24:41PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > You can also build ACE so that it will use scope system > > threads when it wants (don't define ACE_LACKS_THREAD_PROCESS_SCOPING > > in config-freebsd.h). > > Should this become the default for config-freebsd.h, or should > we leave it alone? I can submit a patch which does something like: I guess that depends on what ACE does when it (pthread_attr_setscope) fails (in libc_r, and perhaps libthr if scope process is specified). > > It could be. Signals are mostly done; there are a few changes > > that David will be checking in really soon that should leave just > > one issue with signals and sigwait() which we are not sure about. > > OK, that's very nice! At what point will the signal support > be good enough to comply with POSIX Real-time signals? FreeBSD doesn't support them yet AFAIK. I don't think it would be that difficult to make libpthread comply when we do support them (basically, we just need to deliver RT signals in a certain order). -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10307152132320.10905-100000>