Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:37:20 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@complx.LF.net> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPSec VPN & NATD (problem with alias_address vs redirect_addr ess) Message-ID: <20031116193720.GA61630@complx.LF.net> In-Reply-To: <200311161911.UAA25957@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> References: <20031115182409.GA2001@blossom.cjclark.org> <200311161911.UAA25957@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > FreeBSD lacks features deployed in the market, when acting as a VPN > endpoint, as well as when acting as a NAT device in the VPN packet flow. > Either is a pity, unfortunately. > > I am not complaining; I am just stating that we're behind. But FreeS/WAN > is in no better shape. Who would be willing/capable to add this to the code, if someone else (maybe LF.net?) would pay for the expense ? -- MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger 17 years to go ! LF.net GmbH fon +49 711 90074-23 pi@LF.net Ruppmannstr. 27 fax +49 711 90074-33 D-70565 Stuttgart mob +49 171 3101372
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031116193720.GA61630>