Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:45:54 +0100 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: recent 8.2-STABLE commits break nullfs for tinderbox? Message-ID: <4D120F22.7070105@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik%2BfZozHMsQBEtCQrr%2Bh3VwFxLq3J1%2Bh10YRmK4@mail.gmail.com> References: <4D11E902.3070102@FreeBSD.org> <4D11F29F.8060108@sentex.net> <4D11FB50.5040307@FreeBSD.org> <20101222132919.GA19916@icarus.home.lan> <AANLkTik%2BfZozHMsQBEtCQrr%2Bh3VwFxLq3J1%2Bh10YRmK4@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Am 22.12.2010 14:53, schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> On 12/22/10, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 02:21:20PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
>>> Am 22.12.2010 13:44, schrieb Mike Tancsa:
>>> > On 12/22/2010 7:03 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
>>> >> Greetings,
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm tracking 8.2-PRERELEASE, and it appears that recent commits to
>>> >> nullfs, zfs,
>>> >> vfs, or thereabouts have broken Tinderbox for me.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm mounting my ports tree via nullfs, which has been working fine for
>>> >> a year.
>>> >>
>>> >> Any ideas, or further info needed?
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> > Whats specifically broken ? Two of the freebsd tinderbox machines are
>>> > RELENG_8 from Dec 3 and they are fine. However, they dont use nullfs,
>>> > just zfs and ufs. Is it just nullfs thats broken ? What are the errors
>>> > you are getting ?
>>>
>>> I updated after that.
>>>
>>> mount_nullfs /usr/ports.cvs /usr/local/tinderbox/portstrees/FreeBSD/ports
>>> fails
>>> with "resource conflict avoided". I'll now rebuild GENERIC from scratch
>>> (including "make clean") to see if that helps.
>>>
>>> Tried switching to NFS, this appears to work now.
>>
>> FWIW, i can't find this error message ("resource conflict avoided")
>> anywhere in /usr/src, /usr/include, nor /usr/ports on RELENG_8 source
>> dated from 2 hours ago.
>>
>> grep -ri "resource conflict" /usr/src does return some results, but
>> nothing that looks identical to the string you posted.
>>
>> Only reason I'm pointing this out: it would be good to find the commit
>> that breaks things for you, if there is such a commit, but we need
>> something to key off of.
>
> Perhaps OP means "resource deadlock avoided"?
>
> Such message appears if you try to mount same mount point with nullfs
> twice - which doesnt have sense.
Then either tinderbox's check if the directory exists is broken, else it
wouldn't retry mounting it, or something else is broken.
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D120F22.7070105>