Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:32:33 -0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        "Webster, Andrew" <awebster@connectalk.com>
Cc:        Qing Li <qingli@freebsd.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Multiple routes to same destination
Message-ID:  <43EB98D1.30702@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <9D61D69E3C1F7F459C5513AD830EE2192BC2AA@mtlex01.connectalk.com>
References:  <9D61D69E3C1F7F459C5513AD830EE2192BC2AA@mtlex01.connectalk.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Webster, Andrew wrote:

>>Qing Li wrote:
>>
>>I use mpd to greate one VPN between the sites, using Multilink PPP, so
>>that
>>data is sent across both links (eitehr round-robon or split packet).
>>I use MPD's udp transport mode to open two UDP sockets
>>and send packets from R1 to R4 and from R2 to R3 (in the diagram
>>    
>>
>below).
>  
>
>>MPD will automatically detect if on e link is down and redirect
>>everything through the remaining link.
>>    
>>
>
>Sounds like a good idea, but would that not cause the MTU to get smaller
>due to the overhead of a MPPP link?  
>Windoze hosts have a horrible time with MTU detection!
>  
>
I think you can now do mtu munging in teh newer mpd
if not you could use the daemon to do it from ports.

>  
>
>>>   I have a private patch that's based on radix_mpath for FreeBSD
>>>      
>>>
>5.4.
>  
>
>>>   I believe andre@freebsd.org is working on a solution.
>>>
>>>   -- Qing
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>>>      
>>>
>>questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Webster, Andrew
>>    
>>
>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:51 AM
>>>To: danial_thom@yahoo.com; Ian Lord; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>>>Subject: RE: Multiple routes to same destination?
>>>
>>>Well, in that case, an ISP wouldn't want to use FreeBSD in their core
>>>      
>>>
>>routers :( :(
>>    
>>
>>>In this particular case, I have redundant links (L1 and L2) between
>>>      
>>>
>two
>  
>
>>locations
>>    
>>
>>>(Loc 1 and Loc 2) with two FreeBSD routers at each location (R1/R2,
>>>      
>>>
>and
>  
>
>>R3/R4)
>>    
>>
>>>which are running OSPF to redistribute routing information between
>>>      
>>>
>>locations.
>>    
>>
>>>Since FreeBSD limits the entries for a particular network to only one
>>>      
>>>
>>active entry,
>>    
>>
>>>the all the traffic for would either go on R1->L1->R4 or R2->L2->R3,
>>>      
>>>
>but
>  
>
>>not both.
>>    
>>
>>>Loc 1___ /---R1--L1--R4---\___ Loc 2
>>>	 \---R2--L2--R3---/
>>>
>>>
>>>Andrew
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
>>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>>      
>>>
>"freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>  
>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-
>>unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>  
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43EB98D1.30702>