Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 04:28:52 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review Message-ID: <20020121012852.GB28808@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzp665w1otd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20020120220254.GA25886@nagual.pp.ru> <200201202314.g0KNEDt34526@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20020120233050.GA26913@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpvgdw1sqp.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121000446.GB27206@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpn0z81rrr.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121002557.GB27831@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpelkk1qnb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020121004906.GA28231@nagual.pp.ru> <xzp665w1otd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:21:34 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > I'm sorry, but in my opinion that should really be the admin's > decision. You can trust a machine without necessarily trusting users > coming from that machine to pick good passwords. I not advocate some my position here, I just explain how OPIE supposed to works, i.e. how people (sysadmins) know about it and know how to configure it. IMHO PAM transition should minimize differences with the documented and known by people way of how OPIE works. Generally speaking, you can submit your ideas to OPIE people and they may add some per-user mechanism in future versions. > No need. See the attached patch. Ok. I'll inform you after some testing. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020121012852.GB28808>