Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 17:08:59 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: dicen@hooked.net, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the default for async in /etc/fstab? Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970127170621.27960B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199701270553.QAA25341@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997, Bruce Evans wrote: > In my tests, ext2fs is fastest for huge sequential i/o's when the block > sizes are closer (8K vs 4K), but there was only a small difference (less > than 10%) between the best and worst cases (best: ext2fs under FreeBSD, > next: ext2fs under Linux, worst: ext2fs under Linux) except for rewrite, next: and worst: are the same here. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.970127170621.27960B-100000>