Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 16:08:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 244514] "reply-to" function in pf breaks RFC 1122 section 3.3.1.1 Local/Remote Decision Message-ID: <bug-244514-227-jAbRFRauD9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-244514-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-244514-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244514 ctminime@yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Closed |New Resolution|Works As Intended |--- --- Comment #4 from ctminime@yahoo.com --- (In reply to Kristof Provost from comment #2) I am re-opening this for a couple of reasons: 1. I don't think my previous reply was seen by Kristof (who closed this). 2. It was closed so fast it left NO room for others in the community to comment 3. One person should not be able to dictate weather something gets looked at. I ask that this be left open for at least a week for commenters. While, the feature may currently work as intended and documented, this could still be an improvement on the reply-to feature. And it is my personal opinion (and backed by RFC) the the behavior I outlined is wrong. If others think this should be addressed, great. Then it should stay open. If others think nothing needs/should be done. I will accept the "closed - works as intended". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-244514-227-jAbRFRauD9>