Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:34:48 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "vnode interlock" Message-ID: <7mptcjzxbb.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20040213060939.Q24610@gamplex.bde.org> References: <7m65ed2j50.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <20040213060939.Q24610@gamplex.bde.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
At Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:16:21 +1100 (EST),
Bruce Evans wrote:
> > @@ -488,9 +488,10 @@
> > VI_LOCK(devvp);
> > snaphead = &devvp->v_rdev->si_snapshots;
> > if ((xp = TAILQ_FIRST(snaphead)) != NULL) {
> > - VI_LOCK(vp);
> > - vp->v_vnlock = ITOV(xp)->v_vnlock;
> > + struct lock *lkp = ITOV(xp)->v_vnlock;
>
> (1) Nested declaration.
> (2) Initialization in declaration.
> (3) No blank line after declaration.
Thanks! Is this better than I committed?
Index: ffs_snapshot.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c,v
retrieving revision 1.78
diff -u -r1.78 ffs_snapshot.c
--- ffs_snapshot.c 12 Feb 2004 08:52:08 -0000 1.78
+++ ffs_snapshot.c 12 Feb 2004 23:33:07 -0000
@@ -488,7 +488,9 @@
VI_LOCK(devvp);
snaphead = &devvp->v_rdev->si_snapshots;
if ((xp = TAILQ_FIRST(snaphead)) != NULL) {
- struct lock *lkp = ITOV(xp)->v_vnlock;
+ struct lock *lkp;
+
+ lkp = ITOV(xp)->v_vnlock;
VI_UNLOCK(devvp);
VI_LOCK(vp);
vp->v_vnlock = lkp;
@@ -1794,7 +1796,9 @@
*/
VI_LOCK(devvp);
if ((xp = TAILQ_FIRST(snaphead)) != NULL) {
- struct lock *lkp = ITOV(xp)->v_vnlock;
+ struct lock *lkp;
+
+ lkp = ITOV(xp)->v_vnlock;
VI_UNLOCK(devvp);
VI_LOCK(vp);
vp->v_vnlock = lkp;
--
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7mptcjzxbb.wl>