Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 10:29:29 -0500 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/open-vm-tools Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <4F09B659.90804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120108123157.GA25884@FreeBSD.org> References: <201201080120.q081Kdq3018820@repoman.freebsd.org> <4F08FDB1.7000607@FreeBSD.org> <4F0983DE.9030609@freebsd.org> <4F098926.7000903@freebsd.org> <20120108123157.GA25884@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/12 07:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:16:38AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> so, vote? >> >> revert with portepoch? or mark broken for now? > > PORTEPOCH bumps should usually be avoided, as they can never go > back (unless you move the port to a different name). How hard/long > do you expect to get the fix? Marking the port BROKEN for a short > while is probably fine, since vendor (as you've mentioned in > another email) supports FreeBSD, and should probably facilitate in > fixing it. > > ./danfe I agree, I'm OK with waiting if it won't be too long. Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPCbZZAAoJEPXPYrMgexuhOWwIAJWgQQNX8bdpvFb/XTjSpmxv /KDv7gx5zaqei/c9zBIDLQ8Nb77lt/dmKxN8Px8y1353mda1oYzGAoaVZNBjtKS/ gKGjXDfNQN9fN5o3UwYaDb6L5GKdinlOZMrX7+oI+wunNM9vFnSaHGIExdDir/xL 2bx3vi/XA3caiw9HxiM2G+oMHjYsiUvs+KE9xma2SPKABNFSoKMl1o/v4bwbsB79 PMEYOjtvRR6q5HFi48SS0jsuT/VGiJmttM65VV24blGuOhozfGx0c95I9HJmuhJk XY0EnPx5FIYGlopDWctlOQ1S9gbm/wBodPNtHaA9WtI9AtkhuD02LxZYcYk9+zQ= =v+to -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F09B659.90804>