Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:09:07 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux compatability broken? Message-ID: <20020723220907.GK7060@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> In-Reply-To: <20020723163458.I282-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu> References: <20020723174520.GD7060@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20020723163458.I282-100000@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:35:38 -0500 (EST)
> From: Eric Dedrick <dedrick@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu>
> To: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz>
> Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
> Subject: Re: linux compatability broken?
>
> > > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:52:49 -0500 (EST)
> > > From: Eric Dedrick <dedrick@dsl-146-127.resnet.purdue.edu>
> > > To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
> > > Subject: linux compatability broken?
> > >
> > > I recently made a few kernel changes so I remade world.
> > >
> > > It would seem that linux compatability is now broken. At first things
> > > were complaining about the fact that ld-linux.so.2 got moved. After I
> > > made symbolic links things failed with a bad system call signal 12.
> > >
> > > Weren't all of my modules, including the compatibility ones, updated with
> > > make world?
> >
> > barring a knob in (IIRC) /etc/make.conf, kernel modules are built
> > and installed during make buildkernel and make installkernel,
> > respectively
>
> Okay, so any guesses why my linux compatiability would break?
no idea, really. i don't use any linux apps atm.
--
FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE
12:08AM up 7 days, 10:27, 7 users, load averages: 0.05, 0.10, 0.07
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020723220907.GK7060>