Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:49:01 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind in FreeBSD, security advisories Message-ID: <20130730164901.01a060d6@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <1375193250.26582.3266927.032EF30B@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <CAO%2BPfDctepQY0mGH7H%2BgOSm4HJwhe-RCND%2BmxAArnRxpWiCsjg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFHbX1%2BJyHSPCccmf%2Bhk4C2b8wOcAUvxraFv7%2B04bNbbxbO33g@mail.gmail.com> <20130730.154208.41672901.sthaug@nethelp.no> <1375193250.26582.3266927.032EF30B@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:07:30 -0500 Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 8:42, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote: > > > > and every contrib part which is removed, detracts from this. > > > > And every contrib part that is added to base is another piece of > software that rots for the life of a major release and ends up getting > replaced by frustrated endusers with the latest in ports... > > The tight integration of the base system that everyone appreciates and > respects is far below high-level software like BIND. So Linux did already nullify the contributions in the base system by eleminating ALL contributions but the kernel - the purest way one can go. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR99JdAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8xDoH/3NFsa7Ahi4nxTakvQffZbZ7 Oidq7onaymkDWx+664pdxhyuVZQSYWN9TZraVeTom5W9h4P3dXPEgtrvIUdfAXSf gpxT1q8+X9/KYYHLlOXFr/N0xmaCm19tJH4O4TnUWxIme6eriyZFjp08HpG8o0hz CitCUD9rSgvB9tCw18sPnAOeGHAiTAaCWRRQoMhqYN3jReT5k76wPDEpFt1bd3mK hDt7nFEwm4FW2xTF+OAmvE/gvbZeoB9DM1gW/tndHXTc//wCwd1KLGf4aR3q+V9P 184UKrxgvNI5gXBctolvfTdsg9cq8Y4iKTAoD3dYTncNNf/Y3Ny3alSxk7Ru03s= =6Ny1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130730164901.01a060d6>